One of many sectors which fosters nationwide growth is schooling by guaranteeing the event of a useful human useful resource. The establishment of robust academic constructions results in a society populated by enlightened individuals, who may cause optimistic financial progress and social transformation. A Constructive social transformation and its related financial progress are achieved because the individuals apply the talents they discovered whereas they had been at school. The acquisition of those abilities is facilitated by one particular person all of us ‘trainer’. Because of this, nations in search of financial and social developments needn’t ignore lecturers and their position in nationwide growth.
Academics are the key issue that drives college students’ achievements in studying. The efficiency of lecturers typically determines, not solely, the standard of schooling, however the basic efficiency of the scholars they practice. The lecturers themselves subsequently must get one of the best of schooling, to allow them to in flip assist practice college students in one of the best of the way. It’s recognized, that the standard of lecturers and high quality instructing are among the most vital components that form the training and social and tutorial progress of scholars. High quality coaching will guarantee, to a big extent, lecturers are of very top quality, in order to have the ability to correctly handle school rooms and facilitate studying. That’s the reason trainer high quality continues to be a matter of concern, even, in nations the place college students persistently get hold of excessive scores in worldwide exams, reminiscent of Tendencies in Arithmetic and Science Examine (TIMSS). In such nations, trainer schooling of prime significance due to the potential it has to trigger optimistic college students’ achievements.
The construction of trainer schooling retains altering in nearly all nations in response to the hunt of manufacturing lecturers who perceive the present wants of scholars or simply the demand for lecturers. The modifications are makes an attempt to make sure that high quality lecturers are produced and typically simply to make sure that school rooms are usually not freed from lecturers. In the usA, tips on how to promote top quality lecturers has been a problem of rivalry and, for the previous decade or so, has been motivated, principally, via the strategies prescribed by the No Youngster Left Behind Act (Completed California Academics, 2015). Even in Japan and different Jap nations the place there are extra lecturers than wanted, and constructions have been instituted to make sure top quality lecturers are produced and employed, points referring to the trainer and instructing high quality are nonetheless of concern (Ogawa, Fujii & Ikuo, 2013). Instructor schooling is subsequently no joke anyplace. This text is in two elements. It first discusses Ghana’s trainer schooling system and within the second half seems at some determinants of high quality instructing.
2.zero TEACHER EDUCATION
Ghana has been making deliberate makes an attempt to provide high quality lecturers for her fundamental faculty school rooms. As Benneh (2006) indicated, Ghana’s purpose of trainer schooling is to offer an entire trainer schooling program via the supply of preliminary trainer coaching and in-service coaching packages, that may produce competent lecturers, who will assist enhance the effectiveness of the instructing and studying that goes on in colleges. The Preliminary trainer schooling program for Ghana’s fundamental faculty lecturers was supplied in Faculties of Training (CoE) solely, till fairly just lately when, College of Training, College of Cape Coast, Central College School and different tertiary establishments joined in. Probably the most putting distinction between the packages supplied by the opposite tertiary establishment is that whereas the Universities train, look at and award certificates to their college students, the Faculties of Training provide tuition whereas the College of Cape Coast, via the Institute of Training, examines and award certificates. The coaching packages supplied by these establishments are makes an attempt at offering many certified lecturers to show within the colleges. The Nationwide Accreditation Board accredits trainer coaching packages with a view to guarantee high quality.
The Nationwide Accreditation Board accredits trainer education schemes based mostly on the construction and content material of the programs proposed by the establishment. Therefore, the programs run by numerous establishments differ in content material and construction. For instance, the course content material for the Institute of Training, College of Cape Coast is barely completely different from the course construction and content material of the Middle for Proceed Training, College of Cape Coast and none of those two packages matches that of the CoEs, although all of them award Diploma in Fundamental Training (DBE) after three years of coaching. The DBE and the 4-year Untrained Instructor’s Diploma in Fundamental Training (UTDBE) packages run by the CoEs are solely related, however not the identical. The identical may be mentioned of the Two-year Submit-Diploma in Fundamental Training, 4-year Bachelor’s diploma packages run by the College of Cape Coast, the College of Training, Winneba and the opposite Universities and College Faculties. In impact though, identical merchandise entice identical purchasers, the preparation of the merchandise are carried out in several methods.
It’s via these many packages that lecturers are ready for the fundamental colleges – from nursery to senior excessive colleges. Different pathways, or packages via which lecturers are ready are seen to be good in conditions the place there are shortages of lecturers and extra lecturers must be skilled inside a really quick time. A typical instance is the UTDBE program, talked about above, which design to equip non-professional lecturers with skilled abilities. However this try to provide extra lecturers, due to scarcity of lecturers, has the tendency of comprising high quality.
As famous by Xiaoxia, Heeju, Nicci and Stone (2010) the components that contribute to the issues of trainer schooling and trainer retention are assorted and complicated, however one issue that trainer educators are involved about is the choice pathways via which trainer schooling happen. The prime purpose of lots of the pathways is to quick observe lecturers into the instructing career. This short-changed the required trainer preparation that potential lecturers want earlier than changing into classroom lecturers. Those that favor different routes, like Educate for America (TFA), in accordance with Xiaoxia, Heeju, Nicci and Stone (2010) have defended their different pathways by saying that though the scholars are engaged in a short-period of pre-service coaching, the scholars are academically sensible and so have the capability to study rather a lot in a brief interval. Others argue that in topics like English, Science and arithmetic the place there are often shortages of lecturers, there have to be a deliberate opening up of other pathways to good candidates who had carried out English, Arithmetic and Science programs on the undergraduate stage. None of those arguments in assist of other pathways, maintain for the choice trainer education schemes in Ghana, the place the academically sensible college students shun instructing attributable to causes I shall come to.
When the goal is simply to fill vacant school rooms, problems with high quality trainer preparation is relegated to the background, someway. Proper on the choice stage, the choice pathways ease the requirement for gaining entry into trainer education schemes. When, for instance, the second batch of UTDBE college students had been admitted, I can say with confidence that entry necessities into the CoEs weren’t adhered to. What was emphasised was that, the applicant have to be a non-professional fundamental faculty trainer who has been engaged by the Ghana Training Service, and that the applicant holds a certificates above Fundamental Training Certificates Examination. The grades obtained didn’t matter. If this pathway had not been created, the CoEs wouldn’t have skilled college students who initially didn’t qualify to enroll within the common DBE program. Nonetheless, it leaves in its path the debilitating impact compromised high quality.
Even with common DBE packages, I’ve realized, only in the near past I need to say, that CoEs in, explicit, are usually not attracting the candidates with very excessive grades. This as I’ve learnt now has an enormous affect on each trainer high quality and trainer effectiveness. The very fact is, trainer education schemes in Ghana are usually not considered prestigious packages and so candidates with excessive grades don’t go for education schemes. And so the vast majority of candidates who apply for trainer education schemes have, comparatively, decrease grades. When the entry requirement for CoEs’ DBE program for 2016/2017 tutorial 12 months was printed, I observed the minimal entry grades had been dropped from C6 to D8 for West African Senior Secondary College Examination candidates. This drop in customary might solely be attributed to CoEs’ try to draw extra candidates. The colleges too, decrease their lower off level for education schemes in order entice extra candidates. The colleges as alleged by Levine (2006) see their trainer education schemes, so to say, as money cows. Their need to make cash, pressure them to decrease admission requirements, just like the CoEs have carried out, with a view to enhance their enrollments. The truth that, admission requirements are internationally lowered with a view to obtain a purpose of accelerating numbers. This weak recruitment apply or reducing of requirements introduce a critical problem to trainer schooling.
The Japanese have been capable of make trainer schooling and instructing prestigious and therefor entice college students with excessive grades. One might argue that in Japan, the provision of lecturers far exceeds the demand and so authorities are usually not beneath any strain to rent lecturers. Their system will not endure in the event that they do all they will to pick larger grade scholar into trainer education schemes. To them, the problems referring to the number of lecturers are extra vital that the problems referring to recruitment. Nonetheless, in western and African nations the problems referring to recruitment are prime. It’s so as a result of the demand for lecturers far outweighs that of provide. Western and African nations have difficulties recruiting lecturers as a result of lecturers and the instructing career will not be held in excessive esteem. Instructor education schemes subsequently don’t entice college students who’ve excellent grades. It’s value noting that, it isn’t the recruiting process solely that determines whether or not or not trainer schooling shall be prestigious, nevertheless recruiting candidates with excessive grades, ensures that after coaching, lecturers will exhibit the 2 traits important to efficient instructing – high quality and effectiveness. Instructor schooling may be efficient if the instructing career is held in excessive esteem and subsequently capable of entice one of the best of candidates. In any other case, no matter incentives put into place to draw candidates and no matter the measures that shall be put in place to strengthen trainer schooling, trainer education schemes can not absolutely obtain its goal.
To be able to strengthen trainer preparation, there may be the necessity for trainer preparation packages to offer good coaching throughout the preliminary trainer coaching stage, and supply and maintain assist throughout the first few years after the lecturers have been employed. That’s the reason Lumpe (2007) helps the concept pre-service trainer education schemes ought to guarantee lecturers have gained a great understanding of efficient instructing methods. Methodology lessons subsequently ought to middle on efficient instructing methods. No matter the pathway the coaching program takes, this system have to be structured such that trainees achieve information about pedagogy, in addition to the information of material. They need to additionally get sufficient publicity to sensible classroom expertise just like the on-campus and off-campus instructing apply. Whether or not or not there may be the necessity to fill vacancies within the classroom because of the excessive trainer attrition, many nations face, trainer preparation packages ought to purpose at producing high quality and efficient trainer and never simply filling vacancies.
three.zero DETERMINANTS OF TEACHER QUALITY
Instructor high quality has such monumental affect on college students’ studying. Anybody who has been within the instructing enterprise will agree that trainer high quality is central to schooling reform efforts. Priagula, Agam & Solmon (2007) described trainer high quality as an vital in-school issue that affect considerably on college students’ studying. High quality lecturers have optimistic affect on the success of scholars. The place the scholars have high quality and efficient lecturers the scholars make studying beneficial properties whereas these with ineffective lecturers present declines. With respect to the classroom trainer, trainer high quality is a steady means of doing self-assessment in order to have skilled growth and a self-renewal, with a view to improve instructing. For the trainer educator, an efficient or high quality trainer is one who has a great subject-matter and pedagogy information, which the he/she will be able to construct upon.
Excellent lecturers possess and exhibit many exemplary qualities. They’ve the talents, material, and pedagogy to succeed in each youngster. They assist equip their college students with the information and breadth of consciousness to make sound and impartial judgments. Three determinants of trainer high quality shall be thought of right here. They’re; pedagogical information, subject-matter content material information and expertise.
three.1 PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Trainees of each career obtain some kind of schooling that may give them perception into and put together them for the duty forward. That of the trainer is named Pedagogical Content material Information or Pedagogical Information. Pedagogical Content material Information may be described as, information the lecturers use in organizing school rooms, delivering the content material the scholars should present mastery over and for managing the scholars entrusted into their care. Usually talking, pedagogical information is information the trainer makes use of to facilitate college students’ studying. Pedagogical Content material Information is in two main varieties – lecturers’ information of the scholars’ pre-conceptions and lecturers’ information of instructing methodologies. College students come to class with a bunch of pre-conceptions referring to the issues they’re studying. The pre-conceptions might or might not be according to the precise subject-matter that’s delivered. Academics will need to have a good suggestion of each sorts of preconception, with a view to assist college students, exchange the inconsistent pre-conceptions or construct upon the constant pre-conceptions to result in significant studying. Academics will need to have a repertoire of instructing methodologies for facilitating college students’ studying. When the methodologies are utilized wrongly little or no studying happens in college students. In impact when both of the 2 is weak, the trainer turns into a foul one as a result of that trainer won’t be able to execute his/her accountability within the vocation he/she has chosen. On account of this throughout trainer preparation, Pedagogical Content material Information is emphasised.
Academics achieve Pedagogical Content material Information from numerous sources. Friedrichsen, Abell, Pareja, Brown, Lankford and Volkmann (2009) distinguished three potential sources of Pedagogical Content material Information. They listed the sources as skilled growth packages, instructing experiences and lastly lecturers’ personal studying experiences. Throughout their days as college students in trainer education schemes, lecturers are assisted in selection methods to achieve Pedagogical Content material Information. For examples, throughout apply, they discover ways to put the pedagogical abilities they learnt. Instructor education schemes and different skilled growth packages create avenues for lecturers to achieve pedagogical content material information via workshops, lectures, working along with colleagues, and in instructing apply. Then their experiences of their school rooms as they train college students cause them to achieve perception into which methodologies work beneath finest beneath particular conditions. That final supply is often ignored. It signifies that the skilled information of the trainer begins to develop lengthy earlier than the trainer turns into a candidate coming into into trainer schooling. This implies, the way in which lecturers train influences to a big extent the potential lecturers’ skilled information and beliefs. This kind of studying is, typically, neglected by lecturers in any respect ranges as a result of unintentional and casual, it’s.
Pedagogical Content material Information may be gained via formal and casual means. Studying alternatives for pedagogical content material information, formally, designed by establishments, based mostly on studying targets which typically are prerequisite for certification, constitutes the formal means. In formal studying, college students have clear concepts in regards to the goal of buying pedagogical abilities. Casual studying, alternatively, will not be organized deliberately. It takes place by the way and so may be thought of as ‘facet impact’. As Kleickmann et al (2012) described it, it has no purpose with respect to studying outcomes, and it’s contextualized to a big extent. That is usually known as studying by expertise. Casual, however deliberative, studying conditions exists. This happens in conditions reminiscent of studying in teams, mentoring, and intentional practising of some abilities or instruments. Werquin (2010) described casual, however deliberative, studying as non-formal studying. In contrast to formal studying, non-formal studying doesn’t happen in academic establishments and doesn’t entice certification. Whether or not pedagogical content material information
Pedagogical Content material Information is used to bridges the hole between content material information and precise instructing. By bridging the hole, it ensures that discussions of content material are related to instructing and that discussions themselves are centered on the content material. As such, Pedagogical Content material Information is one thing lecturers should take note of. Academics who possess and use good Pedagogical content material information have good management over classroom administration and evaluation, information about studying processes, instructing strategies, and particular person traits (Harr, Eichler, & Renkl, 2014). Such lecturers are capable of create an environment that facilitates studying and are additionally capable of current or facilitate the training of ideas by even lazy college students. They’re able to make studying simpler by college students therefore trainer with excessive pedagogical content material information may be categorised as high quality lecturers. It’s value noting that it isn’t pedagogical content material information solely that makes good lecturers. A trainer won’t be good if he/she is grasp of pedagogical information however lacks material content material information.
three.2 SUBJECT-MATTER KNOWLEDGE
The purpose of instructing is to assist learners develop mental assets that may allow them take part absolutely in the principle domains of human taught and enquiry. The diploma to which the trainer can help college students to study relies on the subject-matter the trainer possesses. That’s to say, lecturers’ information of subject-matter has affect on their efforts to help college students to study that subject-matter. If a trainer is ignorant or not effectively knowledgeable he/she can not do college students any good, he/she’s going to reasonably a lot hurt them. When the trainer conceives information in such a manner that it’s slender, or shouldn’t have correct data referring to a selected subject-matter, he/she’s going to cross on these identical shallow or inaccurate data to college students. This sort of trainer will hardly acknowledge the constant pre-conceptions and problem the misconceptions of scholars. Such a trainer can introduce misconceptions as he/she makes use of texts uncritically or inappropriately alter them. It’s the trainer’s conception of data that shapes the type of questions he/she asks and the concepts he/she reinforces in addition to the types of duties the trainer designs.
Academics’ subject-matter matter content material information should transcend the particular matters of their curriculum. It is because the trainer doesn’t solely outline ideas for college kids. Academics clarify to college students why a selected idea or definition is suitable, why learners should comprehend it and the way it pertains to different ideas or definitions. This may be carried out correctly if the trainer possesses a great understanding of the subject-matter. This kind of understanding consists of an understanding of the mental context and worth of the subject-matter. The understanding of material typically reinforces the trainer’s confidence in delivering classes, thereby making him/her a great trainer.
Expertise is among the components that account for variations in trainer wage, the world over (Hanushek and Rivkin, 2006). The truth that wage variations are based mostly on the variety of years the trainer has served, means that employers imagine the lecturers expertise makes him/her a greater trainer and such a trainer have to be motivated to stay within the service. Although some research like that Hanushek (2011) have recommended that the expertise positively influences trainer high quality solely within the first few years, and that past 5 years, expertise ceases to have optimistic affect on trainer efficacy, widespread sense tells us the one who has been doing one thing for a very long time does higher and with ease. Expertise will subsequently proceed to pay, since, extra skilled lecturers have the propensity to know extra in regards to the subject-matter they train, and suppose and behave appropriately within the classroom, and have rather more optimistic attitudes towards their college students.
Academics who’ve spent extra years of instructing, often, really feel confident of their talent to make use of educational and evaluation instruments. These lecturers are capable of attain even essentially the most difficult-to-reach college students of their school rooms. Additionally they have better confidence of their functionality to manage the category and stop incidence that may make the instructing and studying course of troublesome. Their expertise makes them rather more affected person and tolerant than their counterpart with few years of expertise (Wolters & Daugherty, 2007). Novice lecturers progressively achieve and develop instructing and classroom administration abilities wanted to make them efficient lecturers. They spend time studying themselves – making an attempt to know absolutely the job they’ve entered. The lecturers who’ve spent extra years instructing have gained a wealthy retailer of data the much less expertise lecturers shall be making an attempt to construct. Academics’ sense of effectiveness is usually related to good attitudes, behaviors and interactions with their college students. That is one thing the skilled trainer has already acquired. These clarify why extra skilled lecturers are often simpler lecturers than the novices.
One more reason extra skilled lecturers are usually higher lecturers than their inexperienced counterparts, is that, skilled lecturers have gained extra coaching, and therefore, have acquired extra instructing abilities, wanted to be efficient from direct expertise. Normally the coaching of lecturers doesn’t finish on the preliminary trainer coaching stage. After commencement, lecturers attend capability constructing seminars, workshops and conferences. These give lecturers the chance to study rising instructing methods and likewise refresh their reminiscences on the issues they’ve learnt. Such seminars, workshops and conferences largely add to the trainer’s retailer of data. The opposite benefit the skilled lecturers have is that they’ve encountered extra conditions to develop the talents wanted to be efficient lecturers via extra direct, and typically oblique experiences. That’s to say, they’ve encountered difficult conditions which gave them the chance to construct their abilities. Whether or not they had been capable of overcome these difficult state of affairs or not, doesn’t matter a lot. If the lecturers encounter troublesome conditions of their lessons, they study from them. If the lecturers are capable of overcome troublesome conditions, they get to know tips on how to resolve such conditions on the subsequent encounter, in any other case their reflections and recommendations from co-teachers offers them concepts about tips on how to strategy identical or related conditions. Additionally they have a better likelihood of being uncovered to present and competent fashions. Extra skilled lecturers have a better likelihood of demonstrating superior self-efficacy in most areas, as a result of they’ve discovered the wanted classroom administration and educational abilities from their colleagues. Academics who’ve been in energetic service for a few years are most definitely to be categorised as high quality lecturers, due to what they’ve learnt from in-service coaching, capability constructing workshops and seminars, their interplay with different lecturers and what they’ve learnt from expertise of their school rooms.
Instructor schooling goals at offering trainer schooling program via preliminary trainer coaching for trainer trainees, and in-service coaching for practising lecturers with a view to produce educated and dedicated lecturers for efficient instructing and studying. To understand this mission, trainer education schemes have been instituted for the coaching of lecturers. These packages differ from one nation to a different. Even throughout the identical nation, there could also be completely different packages coaching lecturers for a similar certificates. These different packages are a created, specifically, the place there are shortages of lecturers, and makes an attempt are being made to coach massive numbers of lecturers at a time. These different packages ease the trainer certification requirement, permitting those that beneath regular circumstances wouldn’t change into lecturers. This introduces critical challenges. As a result of massive numbers of lecturers are wanted inside a brief interval, their coaching is considerably fast-tracked leading to what’s often known as half-baked lecturers – lecturers of decrease high quality. Candidates who didn’t achieve admission into this system of their selection come into instructing solely as a result of they’ve nowhere else to go. Such candidates have a tendency to not be devoted to the instructing service ultimately. Quick-tracking preliminary trainer preparation truly hurt the mission for which the preliminary trainer coaching establishments had been created. It is because the trainer produced via such coaching are often not of top of the range.
Instructor preparation has a direct affect on college students’ achievement. Crucial in-school components upon which scholar’s success hinges, is a trainer who has been effectively ready. A well-prepared trainer is one who has gone via a powerful trainer preparation program. It’s subsequently mandatory for educators to work to create wanted enhancements in trainer preparation. To strengthen trainer preparation, trainer preparation packages should present robust preparation throughout the preliminary trainer coaching interval and provides assist to contemporary lecturers till they’re inducted. Pre-service trainer schooling ought to emphasize the acquisition of efficient instructing methods. This may be carried out in methodology lessons and corresponding subject experiences. College students who’ve high quality lecturers make achievement beneficial properties, whereas these with ineffective lecturers present declines, subsequently having top quality lecturers in school rooms has a optimistic affect on college students’ achievements.
Pedagogical content material information, material content material information and expertise determines the standard of a trainer. Academics make subject-matter accessible to college students through the use of Pedagogical content material information. Pedagogical content material information has two broad areas of data: lecturers’ information of scholars’ subject-matter pre-conceptions and lecturers’ information of instructing methods. What Pedagogical content material information does is that, it hyperlinks subject-matter content material information and the apply of instructing, ensuring that discussions on content material are acceptable and that, discussions give attention to the content material and assist college students to retain the content material. The trainer’s job is to facilitate the training of subject-matter by college students. The diploma to which the trainer can help college students to study relies on the subject-matter content material information the trainer possesses. Academics who possess inaccurate data or comprehend the subject-matter in slender methods, hurt college students by passing on the identical false or shallow subject-matter information to their college students. The final of the three determinants of trainer high quality is expertise. Academics who’ve served extra years achieve extra and extra particular coaching by attending seminars, conferences and workshops and in-service coaching and so have a tendency to know their job higher. Additionally they may need met and solved many difficult conditions of their classroom and subsequently know precisely what to do in any state of affairs.
Completed California Academics (2015). A coherent system of trainer analysis for high quality instructing. Training Coverage Evaluation Archives, 23(17) 1 – 23.
Benneh, M. (2006). Explicit points on trainer schooling and coaching in Ghana. Dakar, Senegal: UNESCO.
Friedrichsen, P. J., Abell, S. Ok., Pareja, E. M., Brown, P. L., Lankford, D. M., & Volkmann, M. J. (2009). Does instructing expertise matter? Analyzing biology lecturers’ prior information for instructing in an alternate certification program. Journal of Analysis in Science Educating, 46, 357-383.
Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The financial worth of upper trainer high quality.” Economics of
Training Evaluate 30, 466-479.
Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2006). Instructor high quality.” In E. A. Hanushek, & F. Welch (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of schooling, vol. 2 (pp.1051-1078). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Harr, N., Eichler, A., & Renkl, A. (2014). Integrating pedagogical content material information and pedagogical/psychological information in arithmetic. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 924.
Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2012). Academics’ content material information and pedagogical content material information: The position of structural variations in trainer schooling. Journal of Instructor Training, 20(10). 1 -17.
Levine, A. (2006). Educating faculty lecturers. Washington, DC: Training Faculties Mission. Retrieved from http://www.edschools.org/teacher_report.htm
Lumpe, T. A. (2007). Utility of efficient colleges and trainer high quality analysis to science trainer schooling. Journal of Science Instructor Training 18, 345-348.
Ogawa, H., Fujii, H., & Ikuo, A. (2013). Instructor schooling in japan via coaching program with experiment research. Chemical Training Journal (CEJ), 15, 1 – 10.
Priagula, C., Agam, Ok. F., & Solmon, L. C. (2007). How stakeholders can assist trainer high quality. Charlotte, N.C.: Data Age Publishing.
Werquin, P. (2010). Recognising non-formal and casual studying: Outcomes, insurance policies and practices. Paris, France: OECD publishing.
Wolters, C. A., & Daugherty, S. G. (2007). Purpose Buildings and lecturers’ sense of efficacy: Their relation and affiliation to instructing expertise and tutorial stage. Journal of Academic Psychology 99(1), 181-193.
Xiaoxia A. N., Heeju, J., Nicci, N., & Stone, E. (2010). Recruiting, making ready, and retaining top quality secondary arithmetic and science lecturers for city colleges: The Cal train experimental program. Points in trainer schooling 19(1), 21-40.